I agree that Nick's brilliant book should be compulsory reading for all journalists. As someone who works for BBC World Service news it has made me very aware of the failings of the beeb, but also, I believe, better at my job. I'm replying to your comment because - although I don't know anything about this particular story - on the face of it, i.e. purely on the basis of your account, I don't understand what the problem was. Maybe you could clarify? If the UN brought out a report saying that it - the UN - had found evidence of nuclear activity at the site, should we not report that? I would be surprised and appalled if the BBC represented the contents of a report, by anyone, as the unqualified truth. If that's the impression you got then something clearly went very wrong. Please don't give up on the WS - we need critical and observant listeners!